ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] verisign.com

  • To: "'Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine'" <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Thomas Keller'" <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] verisign.com
  • From: "Monte Cahn" <monte@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:07:22 -0400
  • Cc: "'Scott Jung'" <scott@xxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <200409160806.i8G86V0B037390@nic-naa.net>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcSb5vncvKEVR+iqREaGQEPXab4zvQADtYlQ

Just found out that it is part of the NSI sale and will be up there until
11/1/04.  Maybe we shouldn't pay the registry until 11/1? 


Monte Cahn
Founder/CEO
 
Monte@xxxxxxxxxxx
Monte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
O - 954-984-8445
F - 954-969-9155
 
Moniker.com - ICANN Accredited Corporate Domain Management Services
DomainSystems.com - Domain Sales & After-market Services
CoolHandle.com - World Class Hosting and Email Solutions

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Brunner-Williams
in Portland Maine
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 4:07 AM
To: Thomas Keller
Cc: Scott Jung; registrars@xxxxxxxx; brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] verisign.com 

I'm looking at the 21 April 1999 document "ICANN Names Competitive
Domain-Name Registrars" [1], which reads in part:

(WASHINGTON - April 21, 1999) The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
and Numbers (ICANN) today announced the five companies that have been
selected to participate in the initial testbed phase of the new competitive
Shared Registry System for the .com, .net, and .org domains. These five
participants will be the first to implement the new system for competition
in the market for .com, .net, and .org domain name registration services.
Currently, registration services in the .com, .net, and .org domains are
provided by Network Solutions, Inc. (NSI), which has enjoyed an exclusive
right to handle registrations under a 1993 Cooperative Agreement with the
U.S. Government.

The five registrars participating in the testbed are, in alphabetical order:

    * America Online
    * CORE (Internet Council of Registrars)
    * France Telecom/Oléane
    * Melbourne IT
    * register.com

The VGRS/NSI deal that Scott just noticed appears to be consistent with the
regulatory environment prior to Phase 1 of the Cooperative Agreement between
NSI and the U.S. Government, so today's date is probably late 1998, or the
first few months of 1999.

On the plus side, George W. Bush is still the Governor of Texas, the tech
economy is still healthy, there is a chance Ira Magizeener, Mike Roberts,
Ester Dyson and Loui Touton won't make the same mistakes, and we can eject
NSI from the registrar's constituency because it is a registry.

Now we need to get a motion drafted, endorsed and balloted to notice the
ICANN BoD that the equal access provision is in breech. I'm on my first cup
of coffee, but my bet is more litegation.

Eric

[1] http://www.icann.org/announcements/icann-pr21apr99.htm






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>