ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] ICANN Budget

  • To: "'Jean-Michel Becar'" <jmbecar@xxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] ICANN Budget
  • From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 14:13:52 +0530
  • In-reply-to: <40C81BF7.3050601@gmo.jp>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcROxbhAK5AzNyBXR1W8K/C13vkh2wAAQ60w

Hi all,

I believe the next step from our side (and Elana correct me if I am wrong)
was that we as a constituency would come up with a budget which all of us
are in favour of and then tell ICANN that this is what we are willing to
approve

This would contain -

* total budget amount
* registrar contribution
* fair and equitable allocation method
* cap figures

Etc

Is the BAG taking up this responsibility?

Best Regards
Bhavin Turakhia
Founder, CEO and Chairman
DirectI
--------------------------------------
http://www.directi.com
Direct Line: +91 (22) 5679 7600
Direct Fax: +91 (22) 5679 7510
Board Line (USA): +1 (415) 240 4172
Board Line (India): +91 (22) 5679 7500
--------------------------------------  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Jean-Michel Becar
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 2:00 PM
> To: 'Registrars Constituency'
> Subject: [registrars] ICANN Budget
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> I think it's time to come together and to take the chance 
> that Paul gave to us during the last conf call, he is ready 
> to study our contract about our fee and espacially to put a 
> cap for the next years.
> 
> So how we can proceed with that?
> 
> First of all do we have a consensus in the constituency that 
> we should add this to our contract in a form or another, may 
> be it can a puclic annoucement or an annex to our contract.
> Then we need may be to word that so we just hand it over to 
> ICANN and then nominate somebody to negociate with ICANN.
> 
> That have nothing to do with the approval or not of the 
> 2004-2005 budget, this is another issue we need still need to 
> vote on. But at least let's try to have this cap on our 
> contract this year to avoid another big increase next year.
> Regards,
> Jean-Michel Becar
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>