<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] RE: Appeal to ICANN Finance committee to modify ICANN Budget proposal
- To: Jim Archer <jim@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Appeal to ICANN Finance committee to modify ICANN Budget proposal
- From: Rick Wesson <wessorh@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 10:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: tbarrett <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Bhavin Turakhia'" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Kurt Pritz'" <pritz@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <876689903.1085418847@[192.168.3.50]>
- References: <007101c43ddb$f9b69080$6601a8c0@blackdell> <876689903.1085418847@[192.168.3.50]>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The confrence is already scheduled.
http://www.pfir.org/meltdown
PFIR Conference Announcement:
"Preventing the Internet Meltdown"
July 26 through 28, 2004
Los Angeles, California, USA
bring your bits to be tossed into the bay =)
-rick
On Mon, 24 May 2004, Jim Archer wrote:
> --On Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:00 PM -0400 tbarrett <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > As a quasi-governmental body, ICANN generates funds through taxes from
> > registrars and registries. As tax-payers, we need to push for a cap on
> > the annual growth of taxes that we pay to ICANN. The ICANN staff and
>
> A close analogy, except that ICANN gets to elect it's own board members.
> Would anyone care to meet in Marina del Rey and toss some tea into the
> ocean?
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|