ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Find attached a sheet to show you your per domain cost vs other registrars

  • To: Bhavin Turakhia <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] Find attached a sheet to show you your per domain cost vs other registrars
  • From: elliot noss <enoss@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 14:48:17 -0400
  • Cc: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <auto-000003699574@fr1.webmaillogin.com>
  • References: <auto-000003699574@fr1.webmaillogin.com>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
...or in the way people actually have to pay, $19,000 vs $273,000. I want to go back to Ross' comment. Registrars are definitely getting the short end of the stick, but I believe until next year we have no choice.

Bhavin Turakhia wrote:

....here is a spreadsheet that may be a bit more reflective of the situation (including csv for eric). 


In the UNDER THE NEW BUDGET COLUMN you forgot to add $19000 for every
registrar :). I am not cribbing abt the $0.25 per domain fee. So please find
attached the new sheets with your calculations in them and two more columsn
I have added

As you can see this new budget means a 41% increase for TUCOWS but a 537%
increase for any registrar with around 20000 names

bhavin 


--
Elliot Noss
Tucows Inc.
416-538-5494
enoss.blogware.com

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>