<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment
- To: Bhavin Turakhia <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment
- From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 14:34:11 -0400
- Cc: "'Jay Westerdal'" <jwesterdal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <200405181831.i4IIV7821699@pechora.icann.org>
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- References: <200405181831.i4IIV7821699@pechora.icann.org>
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5a (Windows/20040113)
On 5/18/2004 2:31 PM Bhavin Turakhia noted that:
And now add to that the Larger Registrars ...... If this budget goes through
The quickest way to make sure we lose our voice within the process is to
lose our coherency as a group. The fact is that registrars, across the
board, are paying more than their fare share. There's not a spreadsheet
in the world that will tell you any different.
If the under-contributing parties each step-up, then this problem goes away.
--
-rwr
"Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
All life is an experiment.
The more experiments you make the better."
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|