ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment

  • To: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment
  • From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 22:49:38 +0530
  • In-reply-to: <200405181659.i4IGxEB29441@holiday.com.at.spry.com>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcQ84Spoc/68MBKUSBiDcdFcsraURgADOSDwAAOFWIA=

> This is a plan to get rid of smaller registrars. That is my 
> two cents on this situation. I would vote for $0.49 per 
> domain flat, rather then making the smallest registrar in 

I would much rather myself vote for a $0.49 flat fee per domain year than
vote for a model where smaller Registrars are bearing a higher cost than the
larger ones. Offcourse id even much rather see a portion of that $0.49 come
out of Registries who are already making fixed margins.

bhavin




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>