<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Fwd: Press Release of 26/03/2004, United Nations ICT Task Force
- To: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Fwd: Press Release of 26/03/2004, United Nations ICT Task Force
- From: Jean-Michel <jmbecar@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 13:27:45 +0900
- Cc: elliot noss <enoss@xxxxxxxxxx>, registrars@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <200404010024.i310OF87028261@nic-naa.net>
- References: <200404010024.i310OF87028261@nic-naa.net>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
Eric,
Okay I will jump in that discussion cause I had some BoD members who
explained to me their vote:
First of all let remind the facts:
WLS were already decided 2 years ago (I don't remenber which meeting as
I was away of ICANN matters at that time) when the Board asked Verisign
to comply with 6 conditions.
So the Roma 's vote was not about WLS itself but about if the 6
conditions were reached and in that case WLS can fly its way.
This is just facts and have nothing to do with my opinion about WLS
being bad or good.
Regards,
Jean-Michel
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:
Elliot,
Let me know when you get the first BoD member to explain his or her vote.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|