<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] Pop up ads
- To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [registrars] Pop up ads
- From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 06:35:35 -0800
- Cc: Esther Dyson <esther.dyson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<html>
<body>
Is this our "amicus" Esther Dyson's work?<br><br>
<div align="center"><b><a href="http://www.worldtrademarklawreport.com/index.cfm?action=login&c=1046621&id=1026";>Pop-ups
similar to offline ads, claims
</a><i>amicus</i><a href="http://www.worldtrademarklawreport.com/index.cfm?action=login&c=1046621&id=1026";>
brief</a></b> <b>USA</b> <br>
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which protects consumer interests in
the digital world, has filed an <i>amicus</i> brief in the litigation in
which 1-800 Contacts sued pop-up ad provider WhenU.com. The foundation
claims, among other things, that pop-up ads are similar to offline
advertising that diverts consumers' attention to competing products while
they shop.
<a href="http://www.worldtrademarklawreport.com/index.cfm?action=login&c=1046621&id=1026";>Full
text</a> </div>
</body>
</html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|