[registrars] RE: WLS on ICANN's agenda
Dear Mike, During the ICANN Board Meeting tomorrow, could you ask the following questions? When three (3) registrars sent a letter to Paul Twomey on December 3 in support of WLS, it was promptly published on the ICANN website (http://www.icann.org/correspondence/registrars-to-twomey-03dec03.htm). However, when twenty-five (25) registrars sent a letter to Paul Twomey on December 12 opposing WLS, it has not been posted on the ICANN website. See attachment for a copy of this letter. Is there any reason for this descrepancy? What other correspondence has ICANN withheld from the public? In order to regain credibility, ICANN must be more even-handed in publishing correspondence on its website. See you in Rome, Tom -----Original Message----- From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael D. Palage Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 9:02 PM To: Rick Wesson; Registrars List Subject: [registrars] RE: WLS on ICANN's agenda Rick: Sometimes you make me laugh :-) Best regards, Mike -----Original Message----- From: Rick Wesson [mailto:wessorh@xxxxxx] Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 8:41 PM To: Registrars List Cc: Michael D. Palage Subject: WLS on ICANN's agenda Will Mike Palage provide us some in site as to the board's negotiations with Verisign regarding WLS? I hope that mike still has some ties to Registrars enough to clue us in on what transpires next week. see http://www.icann.org/minutes/ Proposed Agenda: ... o WLS Negotiations with VeriSign -rick Attachment:
WLS Letter.pdf
|