ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Transfer policy

  • To: <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "tbarrett" <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Transfer policy
  • From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:17:45 -0500
  • Cc: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcPwG9j8p7Q/z2uYT0+T7gmrXeK9UwAB8BIg
  • Thread-topic: [registrars] Transfer policy

Tom - I also brought up this point during TAG deliberations, so it's certainly something to re-consider since it has gotten the attention of a couple of different folks.

Elana Broitman
Register.com
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
Fax   (212) 629-9309
ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx 


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of ross@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 4:19 PM
To: tbarrett
Cc: 'Registrars Constituency'
Subject: Re: [registrars] Transfer policy


On 2/10/2004 4:15 PM tbarrett noted that:

> Transfers are restricted until 60 days after initial registration or a
> completed transfer.
> 
> Could someone explain why this same 60 day restriction does not apply to
> renewals?
> 

It was felt that the pre-existing commercial relationship didn't 
warrant the restriction. I'd put this in the "compromise" bucket. 
Users were definitely interested in striking a balance between 
restrictions and security that didn't always coincide with the 
economic interests of registrars.

-- 


                        -rwr








                 "Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
                                            All life is an experiment.
                             The more experiments you make the better."
						- Ralph Waldo Emerson

Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>