<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] FOISA
- To: "Cute, Brian A." <bcute@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] FOISA
- From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 14:02:46 -0500
- Cc: "'registrars@xxxxxxxx'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <E41C9410F002254DABE63033B24E12AE0100106F@VAEXM01>
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- References: <E41C9410F002254DABE63033B24E12AE0100106F@VAEXM01>
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird M5 (20040119)
On 2/6/2004 12:58 PM Cute, Brian A. noted that:
I also would take issue with many of the aspects of the points made in the
testimony.
<<smittx_057_xml.PDF>>
Let me know if you have any questions.
I would be interested in hearing more from the constituency regarding
the merits of this bill and this hearing. Gaining an understanding the
full range of points on this tricky continuum will be useful from both
a Whois-TF and Names Council perspective.
Would you be in any sort of position to present an analysis of the
bill and its merits at the Rome meeting? It would be a great way to
foster a constituency dialog on the specifics of this particular subject.
--
-rwr
"Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
All life is an experiment.
The more experiments you make the better."
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|