ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] [Fwd: [dow3tf] Envoi d'un message : TMP1071162345.htm]

  • To: Rob Hall <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] [Fwd: [dow3tf] Envoi d'un message : TMP1071162345.htm]
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:30:42 -0500
  • Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <COEELGHKNGFGPAPMBEELIEDPDBAA.rob@momentous.com>
  • Organization: Tucows Inc.
  • References: <COEELGHKNGFGPAPMBEELIEDPDBAA.rob@momentous.com>
  • Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
On 12/11/2003 1:24 PM Rob Hall noted that:

I find at these things that anyone on the call typically gets an opinion and
it can have weight/sway.

In practice, I've found exactly the opposite actually. Constituencies speaking with one voice have, historically speaking anyways, been treated better by the consensus policy development process. I made a recommendation along those lines to the ExComm last week but haven't heard anything back yet regarding a final decision.

The many voices/more leverage dynamic usually comes into play outside the formal work of the TF (ie - lobbying staff, working with other constituencies in the hallways, et al).

At the end of the day, its not my call to make.

--

                       -rwr








                "Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
                                           All life is an experiment.
                            The more experiments you make the better."
                        - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>