<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] RE: ICANN fees
- To: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [registrars] RE: ICANN fees
- From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:39:11 -0700
- Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <NFBBLJNJELIAEBHKGJNMCENOGMAA.michael@palage.com>
- References: <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894804F9C1D2@ex2k01.corp.register.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
At 04:32 PM 10/14/03 -0400, Michael D. Palage wrote:
You are correct that in Option B the registries are able to increase their
per domain name fee. Thus registrars will likely have to modify their
accounting systems because the registry charges will no longer be $6 (.com,
.net, .org) $5.75 (info), etc per domain name but some higher increment per
domain name.
Dear Michael: I read the second sentence. However, these fees are
retroactive based upon prior registrations. How will that all work out?
Regards, BobC, who is happy to see you back sending Email;-)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|