ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[registrars] Re: Groups - boardrm - New ballot "GNSO Registrar Representative Selection"

  • To: <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [registrars] Re: Groups - boardrm - New ballot "GNSO Registrar Representative Selection"
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:54:01 -0400
  • Cc: "Registrars Mail List" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • References: <COEELGHKNGFGPAPMBEELCEPDCOAA.rob@momentous.com>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

i would agree with rob's suggestion here..


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Registrars Mail List" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 5:43 PM
Subject: RE: Groups - boardrm - New ballot "GNSO Registrar Representative
Selection"


> Elana,
>
> I thought an email contained a second that was sent to the list (at least,
I
> remember seeing Bob reply to it with his statement).  Bob's message of
> Sunday, October 5th shows Jean-Michel and John Wong as the nominations and
> seconder respectively, so I assumed all was in order.
>
> Frankly, I would have happily seconded Bob, but assumed it was already
done
> and not required.
>
> I recommend that Bob be immediately added to the ballot, especially in
light
> of the fact that no annoucement was made to the list stating that Bob had
no
> seconder when it appeared that he did.
>
> Rob.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elana Broitman [mailto:ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 5:38 PM
> To: Rob Hall; registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Registrars Mail List
> Subject: RE: Groups - boardrm - New ballot "GNSO Registrar
> Representative Selection"
>
>
> The rules of procedure require a nomination and a second, and acceptance
> with a conflict statement.  There seems to be no record of the second
prior
> to the cut off date on Monday.  We asked Bob for his seconds, but hadn't
> gotten a response.  If there had been a mistake, the ballot can be
revised,
> but can you please show where the second was made, accepted and conflict
> statement filed by monday?
>
> Thanks
>
> Elana Broitman
> Register.com
> 575 Eighth Avenue
> New York, NY 10018
> Phone (212) 798-9215
> Fax   (212) 629-9309
> ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Hall [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 5:36 PM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Registrars Mail List
> Subject: RE: Groups - boardrm - New ballot "GNSO Registrar
> Representative Selection"
>
>
> Ok ... I will bite ...
>
> I thought Bob Connely was also nominated, seconded and put his statement
to
> the list for these positions.
>
> I see no traffic about him being excluded, so can someone that made the
> decision to exclude him please speak up !
>
> Thanks.
>
> Rob.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 4:51 PM
> Subject: Groups - boardrm - New ballot "GNSO Registrar Representative
> Selection"
>
> Select up to two options from the list of candidates.
>
> - Keller, Thomas
> - Rader, Ross Wm.
> - Tonkin, Bruce
> - Abstain-1
> - Abstain-2
>
> ---
>
>
>
>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>