ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[reg-com]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[reg-com] TR: Reminder: 17/18 May "Approval process for registry changes pdp" teleconference

  • To: "reg-com" <reg-com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [reg-com] TR: Reminder: 17/18 May "Approval process for registry changes pdp" teleconference
  • From: "GNSO SECRETARIAT" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 10:03:24 +0200
  • Importance: Normal
  • Reply-to: <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-reg-com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>From : Philip Sheppard Envoye : lundi 17 mai 2004 09:47
A : gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc : council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : RE: Reminder: 17/18 May "Approval process for registry changes
pdp" teleconference


I am unlikely to be able to make this call. I give my proxy to Grant then
Marilyn.

I can say however that I am overall broadly in favour of the flow charts
presented in the last version.
Guiding principles for any further change (if proposed) should be:
 - is there an existing ICANN process that we can use here rather than
inventing a new one?
-  is the process simple and easy to understand?
- is there the right balance between consultation and speed / simplicity?

Philip






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>