[ispcp] testing -- everybody on ISPCP list can ignore -- except Wolf-Ulrich
OK, all you other ISPCP list members can ignore this message. we're testing Wolf-Ulrich's email here Wolf-Ulrich, you're getting 3 copies of this message - one to your t-online.de address directly - one to your Gmail address (to make sure you see it) - one to via ISPCP list why don't you check and make sure you got all three. if you did, we've done it! thanks Glen and Gisella! mikey On Feb 13, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Mikey, > > please try sending him an email via his "Wolf-Ulrich Knoben" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> address now please > > I think I may have fixed the list problem, let's see if the ISP allows it through! > > Thanks > > Glen > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx] > Envoyé : mercredi 13 février 2013 17:28 > À : Glen de Saint Géry > Cc : Gisella Gruber; Mike O'Connor; Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx > Objet : Re: URGENT - ISPCP list > > hi Glen, > > i would bet that his new ISP is the problem. T-Online is crazy aggressive at filtering for spam. they blocked a wider IP address range than my whole ISP, just because of one spammer. if you go back through the ISP list, you may see the bounce messages. here's the conversation i had with T-Online after i saw that they had an abuse email contact buried in the bounce messages that i was getting from them. i wrote them a note and they got things fixed. you may have to do the same -- or just subscribe Wolf-Ulrich with his Gmail address instead. > > if that's the problem, it will probably be a problem across all the lists that Wolf-Ulrich is subscribed to. again, subscribing him under that Gmail address may be the easiest solution rather than trying to rassle through all the T-Online stuff. > > m > > >>> Dear Mr. O'Connor, >>> >>> on Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:44:28 -0600, you wrote: >>> >>>>> to talk to me: 554 IP=216.250.183.109 - A problem occurred. (Ask your >>>>> postmaster for help or to contact tosa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx to clarify.) (BL) >>> >>> Regrettably parts of a bigger IP range including the mentioned IP had >>> been blocked by our protection system due to impairments and complaints. >>> We will unblock your IP. Please notice that it may take up to 24 hours >>> until the change shows acute effect. >>> >>> Please excuse any inconveniences, but we do not see other possibilities >>> to react to the millions of junkmails we receive at present. Thank you >>> for your appreciation. >>> >>> Kind regards >>> Herbert Gründner >>> >>> Deutsche Telekom AG >>> GLS, Group Information Security >>> SDA-GIS / Abuse >>> T-Online-Allee 1 >>> D-64295 Darmstadt >>> >>> E-Mail: abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> http://postmaster.t-online.de >>> http://www.t-online.de/abuse >>> http://www.telekom.de > On Feb 13, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Dear Gisella, >> >> Wolf-Ulrich is subscribed to the list as "Wolf-Ulrich Knoben" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> I cannot make out why he is not receiving emails, I will pull up the list and look. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Glen >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Gisella Gruber >> Envoyé : mercredi 13 février 2013 16:49 >> À : Glen de Saint Géry >> Objet : URGENT - ISPCP list >> >> Hi >> >> Can you please add Wolf-Ulrich to the ISPCP with this email Wolf-Ulrich >> Knoben <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> He is not receiving the notifications. >> >> I will then test and THEN add his gmail if need be >> >> Thanks >> >> >> On 13/02/2013 15:37, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> hi Wolf-Ulrich, >>> >>> i'd say it's pretty definite that you're not getting the notices from the >>> ISPCP list. so i'm adding Gisela on to this thread. >>> >>> Gisella, could you add both of those addresses for Wolf-Ulrich to the >>> ISPCP listserv? i'm suggesting both because his T-Online ISP may be >>> rejecting mail from ICANN -- they rejected mail from my server until i >>> intervened. the wuknoben@xxxxxxxxx address will get through to him for >>> sure. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> mikey >>> >>> >>> >>> On Feb 13, 2013, at 9:24 AM, tony holmes <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes the call is 16.30 tomorrow >>>> Tony >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> >>>> On 13 Feb 2013, at 14:56, "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx" >>>> <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Do we stay with the call tomorrow at 16:30 UTC? I didn't yet see the >>>>> details. I'd have to reschedule other potential appointments in case. >>>>> Please advise. >>>>> >>>>> Wolf-Ulrich >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:19:54 +0100 >>>>> Subject: Re: [ispcp] [ispcp] ISPCP call >>>>> From: "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> To: tony holmes <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> Thurday is fine for me >>>>> >>>>> El 11/02/2013, a las 12:29, "tony holmes" >>>>> <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> >>>>> escribi??: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sure, will do. >>>>> Tony >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx] >>>>> Sent: 11 February 2013 13:54 >>>>> To: tony holmes >>>>> Cc: Mike O'Connor; >>>>> Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>; >>>>> wuknoben@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:wuknoben@xxxxxxxxx>; >>>>> ispcp@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ispcp@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Subject: Re: [ispcp] [ispcp] ISPCP call >>>>> >>>>> the Thursday time is fine with me. can you ping Gisella so she has the >>>>> call >>>>> on her announcement schedule? >>>>> >>>>> Wolf-Urich, are you getting these posts via the list? i copied your >>>>> Gmail >>>>> account on this message to make sure you got it. >>>>> >>>>> m >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 11, 2013, at 7:49 AM, "tony holmes" >>>>> <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I was sure the details had been circulated but with everything else >>>>> going >>>>> on >>>>>> I may be wrong. Apologies, particularly as this was the date we agreed >>>>> in >>>>>> LA. Its best think we postpone and reschedule. >>>>>> >>>>>> How does Thursday 14th Feb at 16.30 UTC work? >>>>>> >>>>>> This also means we need to fix the provisional agenda for our ISPCP >>>>> meeting >>>>>> in Beijing via email. I'll circulate a proposal later. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> tony >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >>>>>> Behalf Of Mike O'Connor >>>>>> Sent: 11 February 2013 13:32 >>>>>> To: >>>>> Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Cc: tony holmes; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ispcp@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [ispcp] [ispcp] ISPCP call >>>>>> >>>>>> hi Wolf-Urich, >>>>>> >>>>>> looking back, i don't see a meeting invitation on the ispcp list. you >>>>> must >>>>>> be subscribed, because i got your messages through the list. i just >>>>> don't >>>>>> think the meeting announcement ever got sent. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tony, if you decide to proceed with the call, can you circulate the >>>>> details? >>>>>> i'd push them out to the list myself, but i don't have them. >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> mikey >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 11, 2013, at 7:08 AM, >>>>> Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It matches exactly with the prep call of the GNSO council chairs for >>>>> the >>>>>>> next council meeting. So I have a real problem. >>>>>>> Unfortunately I didn't receive any ISPCP call details (bridge) etc. >>>>> in >>>>>>> advance. Maybe my email-address is still not on the list. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wolf-Ulrich >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:45:57 +0100 >>>>>>> Subject: RE: [ispcp] ISPCP call >>>>>>> From: "tony holmes" >>>>> <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> >>>>>>> To: >>>>> >>>>> <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, >>>>> <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The call is today at 15.00 UTC >>>>>>> Details have been circulated. >>>>>>> Tony >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >>>>>>> Behalf Of >>>>> Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> Sent: 11 February 2013 11:12 >>>>>>> To: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ispcp@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> Subject: [ispcp] ISPCP call >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> do we have an ISP call today, or when is the next call scheduled? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wolf-Ulrich >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: >>>>> www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: >>>>>> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: >>>>> www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: >>>>> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido >>>>> únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede >>>>> ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor >>>>> notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine >>>>> inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de >>>>> su >>>>> sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este >>>>> e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas >>>>> destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con >>>>> respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo >>>>> nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely >>>>> for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform >>>>> the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as >>>>> the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any >>>>> person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. >>>>> ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without >>>>> respecting our Information Security Policy. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: >>> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) >>> > > > PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) > PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) Attachment:
smime.p7s |