Re: [ispcp] Inpact of new gTLDS -- with an attachment this time, sorry

["Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am OK with the draft.

Tony Harris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: [ispcp] Inpact of new gTLDS -- with an attachment this time, 
sorry

i have also made some very small changes (i added them to Akinori's draft to 
keep them all together).
i agree wholeheartedly with the approach -- i added SSR to the pile of items 
within the scope of the new/proposed cross-cutting activities.
mikey





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




On Sep 18, 2012, at 12:32 PM, MAEMURA Akinori <maem@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dear Tony,
>
> The attachment is to fix tiny points.  Please integrate them if you agree.
>
> I read it with a fresh eye without involvement to the previous discussion.
>
> I agree that new comers with the new gTLD which is now introduing 1200+ 
> TLDs will completely change the landscape of GNSO composition as written.
> I like the approach to try a different Stakeholder Advisory mechanism from 
> the agenda which are more general to ICANN.
>
> I found some other issues are raised there: overload of GNSO Council, 
> difficulty with joint SO/AC WG activities and the paper seems to propose a 
> way to improve them all at once.
> I had a feeling by it as if the ISPCP propose a process change to include 
> other SO and ACs into the development of the gTLD policies.
> For me, it should have been much easier to read if the different 
> stakeholder advisory mechanism had been within GNSO.
>
> I am afraid that I just tell you my impression without any solution.
> I might have missed any discussion, so it would be great if you find any 
> gap of logic within this paper in my impression.
>
> Sincerely,
> Akinori
>
>
> In message <00c301cd95a0$bbea68a0$33bf39e0$@btinternet.com>
>  "[ispcp] FW: Inpact of new gTLDS"
>  ""tony holmes" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" wrote:
>
> | All
> |
> | Attached is an overdue draft of the ISPCP response on the impact of the 
> new
> | gTLD program. It aligns with the thoughts we discussed in Prague. 
> Apologies
> | for the delay in sending this, but we do need to get it to the Board
> | Governance Committee ASAP.
> |
> | I'd very much appreciate your comments or concurrence ASAP, ideally by 
> this
> | time tomorrow if at all possible.
> |
> | Best Regards
> |
> | Tony
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> <Initial imput on the Impact of new gTLDs on ICANN and its structure - 
> AM.docx>
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax  866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
etc.)