<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ispcp] JAS WG Report
- To: jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ispcp] JAS WG Report
- From: maruyama@xxxxxxxxx (MARUYAMA Naomasa)
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 02:52:56 +0900 (JST)
- Cc: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <014201cc9184$a6dd66e0$f49834a0$@com.br> (jaime@powerself.com.br)
- List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: maruyama@xxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>From: "Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf" <jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:06:56 -0200
>Although there may exist controversial points in the JAS WG Report, I think
>that the lowering of the application fee for needy applicants is something
>that we could support and I would like to state that on the Council.
Povided that there are enough safeguard against exploiting the system.
Are there enough safeguard? I haven't read the report in detail so
I dotn't know.
Masa.
----
(Mr.) NaoMASA Maruyama
Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|