ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: [ispcp] RE: Constituency input to Board/GAC consultations


Tony,

How about this, including the last sentence?

BTW Kurt asked to provide written statements for posting rather than by reading during the session. What's your thinking?




Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. März 2011 15:49
An: jillian.mertsch@xxxxxx; Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [ispcp] RE: Constituency input to Board/GAC consultations

All

Adding a brief line to include Jill's comment would seem to be a useful
addition. Otherwise this appears complete.

Thanks to all who contributed.

Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of jillian.mertsch@xxxxxx
Sent: 16 March 2011 01:20
To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ispcp] RE: Constituency input to Board/GAC consultations


Elegantly done.  I don't have any major changes to offer.  However, is it
worth adding a line calling for the whole process to be concluded as quickly
an efficiently as possible?

Best,
Jillian (Cocayne) Mertsch
VP, US Government Affairs
BT
Mobile: +1 202 281 4334
________________________________________
From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx [KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:03 PM
To: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ispcp] Constituency input to Board/GAC consultations

All,

Following the ISPCP constituency meeting see attached a draft comment to be
delivered tomorrow morning to the public Board session on the applicant
guide book.

Please provide any comments/amendments you may find useful.
Deadline: WEDNESDAY, 08:00 a.m.
<<ISPCP comment.doc>>


Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich


Attachment: ISPCP comment.doc
Description: ISPCP comment.doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>