Re: [ispcp] WG: [council] Motion re. VI WG anD NEXT ISPCP Conf call

["Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Motion re. VI WGTuesday is not good for me unless one hour earlier.
Thursday is ok

Tony Harris
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx ; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 4:26 AM
  Subject: RE: [ispcp] WG: [council] Motion re. VI WG anD NEXT ISPCP Conf call


  Wolf-Ulrich/All

   

  I wasn't able to attend the last call as I was on vacation, but I don't think another date was set.

   

  Suggest we hold a call next week.

   

  PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE A PREFERENCE BETWEEN THE FOLLOWING DATES.

   

  -          Tuesday 5th October   14.00 - 15.00 UTC

  -          Thursday 7th October  13.00 - 14.00 UTC

   

  Thanks

   

  Tony

   

  From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
  Sent: 30 September 2010 08:06
  To: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [ispcp] WG: [council] Motion re. VI WG 

   

  For discussion at our next call.

   

  Do we have a date already?


  Wolf-Ulrich Knoben 

   

   

     


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
    Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. September 2010 19:53
    An: Council GNSO
    Betreff: [council] Motion re. VI WG 

    <<Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10.doc>> 

    In response to the Board retreat resolution regarding VI and in order to meet the 8-day advance requirement for motions, I am submitting this motion and would appreciate a second.  Please forward this to your SGs and constituencies to determine support for the motion on 7 October.

    I am not opposed to other ways of accomplishing this, but thought that a motion is a clear way to kick it off.

    Chuck