<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ispcp] Comments on Vertigal Integration
- To: olivier.muron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ispcp] Comments on Vertigal Integration
- From: maruyama@xxxxxxxxx (丸山直昌)
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 23:32:17 +0900 (JST)
- Cc: tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE0CBB31D9@ftrdmel1> (olivier.muron@orange-ftgroup.com)
- List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: maruyama@xxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Oliver. I accept your revision.
Regards,
Masa.
>Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:31:11 +0200
>From: <olivier.muron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Dear all,
>
>Thank you for the comments.
>
>I suggest to omit the contentious statement:
>"Again, and with regards to Principle No.3, which calls for the concept =
>of SRSU TLDs to be explored further, there is some feeling in our =
>Constituency that this should be addressed through another PDP".
>There is no consensus on this statement.
>
>More over I would suggest to drop the "more conservative" qualification =
>for the proposals and just describe the goals they are aiming at.
>
>See attached version with revisions marks,
>
>Best regards,
>Olivier
----
(Mr.) NaoMASA Maruyama
Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|