ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ispcp] Comments on Vertigal Integration

  • To: olivier.muron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ispcp] Comments on Vertigal Integration
  • From: maruyama@xxxxxxxxx (MARUYAMA Naomasa)
  • Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 04:48:51 +0900 (JST)
  • Cc: harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE0CBB30DA@ftrdmel1> (olivier.muron@orange-ftgroup.com)
  • List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: maruyama@xxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dear Tony and Oliver,

>Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:35:07 +0200
>From: <olivier.muron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>Dear Tony,
>
>I think that we must come to the conclusion that there is no consensus within ISPCP at this stage.
>
>I suggest that we should work further on the topic to get a common position later in the process.

I appreciate Tony's drafting and I also thank Oliver for his comment
while there is some difference of opinion from mine.  Since submitting
a comment from ISPCP is very importatnt, I would like to propose a
compromise.  How about replacing the last sentence in the second
paragraph to the following?

---------------
Again, and with regards to Principle No.3, which calls for the concept
of SRSU TLDs to be explored further, there is some feeling in our
Constituency that this should be addressed through another PDP.
---------------

We have little time left, but I want to make our best.

Regards,

Masa.

----
(Mr.) NaoMASA Maruyama
Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>