[ispcp] WG: [council] Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 10 June 2010

[<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

FYI an excerpt of the upcoming council meeting agenda.
 


Regards 
Wolf-Ulrich 

 


	Item 2: Prioritization of GNSO work (5 Minutes)

	2.1 Refer to TIMELINE FOR FIRST WORK PRIORITIZATION EFFORT
	
http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/cover-letter-work-prioritization-pr
oject-list-30apr10-en.pdf

	2.2 Progress Report (Ken Bour)

	Item 3: GNSO Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) Drafting Team (DT)
Endorsement Process (20 minutes)

	3.1 Refer to (to be inserted URL for proposed process)

	3.2 Overview of GNSO AoC RT Endorsement Process (Bill Drake)

	3.3 Questions/Comments?

	3.4 Motion

	* Refer to
	https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?10_june_motions
	10 june motions
<https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?10_june_motions> 
	
	

	* Discussion

	 

	* Vote

	 

	Item 4: Implementation of New gTLD Recommendation 2 (confusingly
similar names) (25 minutes)

	4.1 General Discussion (continuation from 21 May meeting)

	4.2 Motion

	* Refer to

	https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?20_may_motions
	20 may motions
<https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?20_may_motions> 

	 

	* Discussion

	 

	* Vote

	 

	Item 5: AGP Policy questions (20 minutes)

	5.1 Refer to latest semi-annual update:
	
http://www.icann.org/en/compliance/reports/contractual-compliance-report
-24dec09-en.pdf

	5.2 Brief overview of update (Craig Schwartz)

	5.3 Questions/comments?

	5.4 Discussion of questions raised by Craig Schwartz in the 21
April Council meeting (continued from 20 May)

	* Should the Council consider modifying the AGP Limits Policy to
no longer require semi-annual updates?
	* Should the Council consider modifying the AGP Limits Policy by
defining the terms "extraordinary circumstances" or "reoccur regularly?
For example:

	 

	o Should instances of consumer fraud automatically be a
legitimate use of AGP deletes?
	o If a registrar proactively takes down (i.e., deletes) domains
that are known to propagate a fraudulent activity such as phishing,
should the registrar bear the cost if the deletions cause the registrar
to exceed the threshold defined in the Policy?

	 

	5.5 Next steps?

	Item 6: Whois Studies (20 minutes)

	

	Item 8: Other Business (5 minutes)

	8.1 Agendas for Brussels meetings