<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ispcp] AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
- To: <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ispcp] AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:36:26 +0100
- Cc: <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <7FDBA037-B98D-4E7A-8035-2F444F87F298@graduateinstitute.ch>
- List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <7FDBA037-B98D-4E7A-8035-2F444F87F298@graduateinstitute.ch>
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcqZHinNExc9KvNjQwKgwKR8bTfjpAA9gwKQ
- Thread-topic: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
Following a consultation within the ISPCP constituency I'd like to address the creation of "Support Teams" (ST). There must be a clear distinction between the RTs and potential STs in order to avoid STs emerging to "shadow" RTs. So the composition of the ST pools has carefully to be taken into consideration or should even be regulated. If applicable this should be expressed in the council response.
Apart from that the ISPCP constituency endorses the draft response.
Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von William Drake
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 16:40
An: GNSO Council List
Betreff: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
Hello,
Attached please find the drafting team's proposed response to the draft proposal on the Affirmation Reviews Requirements and Implementation Processes, for discussion with our respective SGs and in the Council.
Best,
Bill
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|