<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ispcp] [Fwd: [liaison6c] Extension : Public Comment Period and constituency statements on PDP-Feb06 to 30 APRIL 2006]
- To: mcf@xxxxxxx, ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ispcp] [Fwd: [liaison6c] Extension : Public Comment Period and constituency statements on PDP-Feb06 to 30 APRIL 2006]
- From: Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:42:24 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=G/FQ+QfdA+8bKo6ZmKvRqQjKSyPWc86pXE61F4mH/QJQ4J2LWaWwXQ7s/PhEeYB8yj+cE7BucCPIFW4PUicrf2UrWHLm/qJb6zPs3yFkJvZkJJ1wZDqmYhkRsdxCjtxyJhXOPhrma7psIXCeLrjF4c/SUo0Qs2y8yqc+OaCf/88= ;
- In-reply-to: <44186020.3060803@uwm.edu>
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I think we should at least mention this in our meeting and ask what
opinions people have.
As for Kurt, I think we should surely listen to him. Maybe it would be
most efficient to put him in the cross-constituency meeting.
My opinion,
Greg
--- Mark McFadden <mcf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Question: Should this also be on our already crowded constituency
> agenda?
> --
>
> Mark McFadden
> Internet, Wireless and Security Certifications
> University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
> Programs at: http://www.sce-it.uwm.edu
> Contact me: e: mcf@xxxxxxx Y!IM: mcfadden AIM: McElmside
> Where is Mark McFadden right now?
> http://beta.plazes.com/whereis/McFadden
> > Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:12:02 +0100
> From: "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: liaison6c <liaison6c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [liaison6c] Extension : Public Comment Period and
> constituency statements on
> PDP-Feb06 to 30 APRIL 2006
>
> [To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
> [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org]
>
>
> Extension of Public Comment Period and constituency statements on the
>
> Terms of Reference for the PDP on policies guiding contractual
> conditions for existing gTLD registry agreements, (PDP-Feb06) to 30
> April 2006.
>
> "Public comments are invited on any of the policy issues included in
> the
> Terms of Reference for the PDP on policies guiding contractual
> conditions for existing gTLD registry agreements, notably:
>
> 1. Registry agreement renewals
> 2. Relationship between registry agreements and consensus policies
> 3. Policy for price controls for registry services
> 4. ICANN fees
> 5. Uses of registry data
> 6. Investments in development and infrastructure
>
> Public comments are open from 7 March 2006 to 30 April 2006.
>
> Please note that any new policies to address these issues must be
> consistent with the ICANN mission and core values, thus it would be
> particularly helpful if the comments are made with reference to the
> ICANN mission and core values as defined in the ICANN bylaws
> http://www.icann.org/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-08apr05.htm#I
>
> --
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
> gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|