RE: [ispcp] Revision 2 of the ISPCP Paper on new gTLDs
Mark Thanks - looks fine apart from one very small typo I picked up (marked on copy). Tony -----Original Message----- From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark McFadden Sent: 31 January 2006 18:58 To: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx Subject: [ispcp] Revision 2 of the ISPCP Paper on new gTLDs All: I've taken Tony Holmes and Antonio Tavares' comments and tried to merge them into a new version of the document. A couple of changes: - I've stressed the need for sponsored gTLDs - I've put more detail in the IDN requirement (however, I left this as a "must") - I've accepted Tony's editorial additions - I've tried to address Antonio's concern about the semantics of obscure names by stressing that semantics are important in the evaluation of new gTLDs. - There were a couple of other minor corrections. I have to get this to the GNSO today, so last chance for any further comments . . . . mark -- Mark McFadden Internet, Wireless and Security Certifications University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Programs at: http://www.sce-it.uwm.edu Contact me: e: mcf@xxxxxxx Y!IM: mcfadden AIM: McElmside Attachment:
BT response to 2006 Strategic Review Numbering final edit.doc |