ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Call for Statements of Interest -- NA RALO Seats on ALAC

  • To: veni markovski <veni@xxxxxxxx>, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Call for Statements of Interest -- NA RALO Seats on ALAC
  • From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:55:19 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=cD1bZgyRFd87EUZFJGUoBse6Dzk0eHOyu3jLmfav/66WipZveVoZSBGoMqGsjL8E; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • Reply-to: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Veni and all,

  I still believe Danny's point is well taken.  It is
difficult if not actually nearly impossible to believe
that one tiny "Club" would be of much value add.  Yet
even so, exclusion, a long standing ICANN practice.

-----Original Message-----
>From: veni markovski <veni@xxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Jun 22, 2007 2:35 PM
>To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [ga] Call for Statements of Interest -- NA RALO Seats on  ALAC
>
>Danny,
>you understand that sometimes the quality is not in the quantity, right?
>As for that - I believe we have had a discussion about the 
>participation in the At Large process. People can choose to be part 
>of this solution, or part of the problem, or part of the landscape. 
>And, as Wendy pointed out, there is no problem for the organizations 
>(e.g. ISOC-New York) to be more active at the At Large.
>So, you could contribute, or continue to try to mock and ruin other 
>people's efforts.
regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams

"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827


>
>veni
>
>At 09:51 6/22/2007  -0700, Danny Younger wrote:
>>Spotted only on the North American discuss list --
>>really great outreach if all you want is a tiny club.
>>Probably deserves a complaint to the Ombudsman's
>>office...
>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>