<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Domain Name Rapid Takedown Procedures
- To: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Domain Name Rapid Takedown Procedures
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 04:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=JLz/00IhwFMtl4YeqIsjoemWkOGoXI9j3UNPDaakV6DSRR9N9nEaubfHcXQoO/qOo2zikTO72+CdKpoMGAIW/Rh8AVIbfnHuV3zvAAQHFALVd4PD8vz9zjZcN1Sygd5qzPI7+X97QrhWS55NgRN+9y1ioBOx+AowkpvnbggXCCk=;
- In-reply-to: <46105687.9060206@cavebear.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What I find particularly troubling is that here we
have a security contributor (facing what he deems to
be a real emergency issue) that can't find a readily
identifiable intake process at ICANN that would
channel his concerns to the appropriate parties for
security-related policy development.
____________________________________________________________________________________
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|