<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Public Forum on GNSO Improvements
- To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Public Forum on GNSO Improvements
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=T85Jd20a1Gw4QXQBtbGOAzjG3FtFv8fyU81l+n8AbPJI/W0KjfnnMuclj5jAgPPpFnmGzZfx3abmmzULECAR0JjVvxzlOWpPId7cTwokd6JIPdGxdhAS+e4lJ6JDjwLwH+1+2l+uq5cvRfDXat/4UPcgDBW2czkJEsQ6u1sYPv4= ;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Susan Crawford has a helpful piece on her blog that helps the reader wade through the addresses where further info can be gleaned;http://scrawford.blogware.com/bloghttp
Participation and observation of Lisbon is laid out here also.
Danny has submitted a position paper that basically does away with the GNSO altogether and as is his usual style it is quite thorough, and a good historical read.
At the very least revamping is inevitable at this point and contributions should be taken seriously.
Eric
---------------------------------
TV dinner still cooling?
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|