<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: is ICANN or is ICANN not?
- To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx>, Roberto Gaetano <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Re: is ICANN or is ICANN not?
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:08:34 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=MPbi5hyTg4AogHkurkmZESheE5DPT4Hl2e1h8YNwZ169lozHDCi/k5ptcUjCRNYBky2mxIqA/ZbCPxa7tGfBJPlHx30ajBSjkntmNBoYGLsIeX4MD7+U787AYaRZjBJWC5tEEAfaIhg4FdAMcHcHJP8cmKHs06eWRoQ3y49gxsI=;
- In-reply-to: <20070130091920.GA6969@nic.fr>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Then what would be the outcome if Russia just changed their minds and decided to make and use a union - say more like the eu as opposed to the old su. They could not get .su up and running again? Hmmm. Now I tend to agree that following ISO blindly would be not suchy a good policy.
An interesting note on .UM and .SU; http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/30/1437224&from=rss
Eric
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:11:52PM +0100,
Roberto Gaetano wrote
a message of 876 lines which said:
> "What should, in your opinion, IANA do in case ISO decides to
> reallocate SU [to a different country]?"
Note that it is purely theoretical since, as Elisabeth explained, the
ISO MA committed to "no reallocation before 50 years", after the
glitch of ".cs".
Should it happen, I would say that IANA should not blindly follow ISO
in that mistake.
---------------------------------
Any questions? Get answers on any topic at Yahoo! Answers. Try it now.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|