ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] XXX

  • To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] XXX
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:01:07 -0800 (PST)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=dCQuplVsNCrvCav3CC0cFljNPDywdMtEb+kh9LLYm4RGw0RdbK3LNb6eoF+hF8pXA4lMrkmTJ2gsmsw0ZomooZT5+JwH8dNj3riQh7eshS7mSrVRhQ97wXAHDt5FUV7AulEDvSdWjpvhSNofCAuRlG6CSDCYMIkUbp3o72j2004=;
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Maybe it is just me but I think existing laws are enough to restrict horrible things like child pornography. We can always do more to enforce the rules, regs and laws but they are there.
  I have trouble with all the restrictions being placed on the XXX proposals, not that the restrictions are bad, but that it would be ICANN enforcing them. ICANN is simply not designed to enforce content of websites and once they cross that slippery slope there will be no turning back.

Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>