ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] The Future of Domain Registry Pricing, if left uncapped

  • To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Karl Auerbach" <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] The Future of Domain Registry Pricing, if left uncapped
  • From: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:56:24 -0400
  • Cc: "George Kirikos" <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • References: <20060809135806.46338.qmail@web53306.mail.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Not to mention that a business constituency and an IP constituency is
redundant.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Karl Auerbach"
<karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "George Kirikos" <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 9:58 AM
Subject: RE: [ga] The Future of Domain Registry Pricing, if left uncapped


> Chuck,
>
> I have similarly come to the conclusion that it may be
> impossible to ever adequately represent Business.
> Businesses are much too diverse and widespread
> around the world to ever be represented in any
> effective manner through organizational processes.
>
> Those that now pretend to represent Business within
> ICANN are self-selected.  How is a Business
> Constituency with self-selected members any different
> than a Registrant's Constituency with self-selected
> members?
>
> If you look at the recent BC Meeting Report from
> Marrakech you will note:
>
> "PDP-06:  No member present felt competent to
> intervene on this issue so attendees agreed not to
> intervene on this issue.
>
> PDP-05:  No member present felt competent to intervene
> on this issue so attendees agreed not to intervene on
> this issue."
>
> At least registrants on the GA list are competent
> enough to discuss the relevant issues.
>
> best regards,
> Danny
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.8/414 - Release Date: 8/9/06
>
>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>