Re: [ga] All future names should be sponsored

[Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Danny Younger wrote:

> With regard to selection criteria, the Business
> Constituency has argued that "all future names should
> be sponsored".

> Comments?

Yes, I'll accept "sponsored-only" TLDs when the bussiness "constituency" 
accepts that no new business may be started and no new product or service 
be released until a sponsoring organization is created that has to apply 
for permission from the "New Businesses, Products, and Services 
Corporation", pay a heafty application fee, and undergo extensive 
inquiries into the color, shape, and usibility by dingos.

		--karl--