ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] A Call for Resignations

  • To: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] A Call for Resignations
  • From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:32:59 -0800 (PST)
  • Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=vASImEsiTE7ohdUG8zzM/cNUDR4oYYtoGny9Hgz76mnXBJeXjW6kMT4wRUxZv+qFnM09DlFS9Jtb8C/+xP0hDgeSY2ew+FSdnpFAh8LRXgRBFp2TWGrzLxO5FtfpduFw25is/UzIp9GM7tzkQu9y9LPpPni2GahI9cOh4YG2O7E= ;
  • In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0502281246300.5844@npax.cavebear.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Karl,
 
Your point is well-taken.  On the other hand, as we did not vote in these appointees, we can't really vote them out... all that we can do is indicate our strong displeasure and ask them to consider stepping aside for the greater good.  I would be satisfied to some degree if this initiative at least resulted in some dialogue between the parties and a renewed ICANN-wide discussion on the future of representation for the At-Large within ICANN.  So far, no reply has been forthcoming from the fifteen members of the ALAC either individually or by way of a spokesperson... 
 
regards,
Danny
 
 
 
 
Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Rather than calling for resignations, which casts a negative light on some 
people who deserve credit for giving the A-LACK a try, would it not be 
better to simply indicate a vote of no-confidence in the A-LACK coupled 
with a demand for a replacement that restores the original and unfulfilled 
ICANN promise of a board of directors elected largely by the community of 
internet users?

--karl--



		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>