<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] request for details about ALAC members
- To: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] request for details about ALAC members
- From: Eric Dierker <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: froomkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, NVICTORY@xxxxxxxxxxxx, RLayton@xxxxxxxxxxxx, censslin@xxxxxxxxxxxx, DEvans@xxxxxxx, KSMITH@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <3F84E4D6.E90C9C54@ix.netcom.com>
- References: <3F84E4D6.E90C9C54@ix.netcom.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Michael and all former DNSO GA members or other stakeholders/users,
>
> I think the more relevant issue or point that Kristy has again
> raised, it why should a obviously illegitimate ALAC be given
> or allowed any "power" of any kind when it does not represent
> any and all "Interested parties" or stakeholders/users unencumbered?
>
Power and legitimacy are clearly different.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|