Re: [ga] Verisign's UDRP actions against others for typosquatting

[Marc Schneiders <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, at 22:35 [=GMT-0700], George Kirikos wrote:

> Given the Verisign mass-typosquatting via Sitefinder, I thought it
> appropriate that we consider Verisign's past actions against others.
> See their WIPO cases:
>
> http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2000/d2000-0303.html
> ("venesign.com")
> http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2000/d2000-1446.html
> ("veresign.com" and "verasign.com")

Couldn't we start a class-action UDRP case against com and net? 100 domain
name holders with a trademark that come up with evidence that Verisign
typosquats on their domain. Simple dig output would do, or prints from IE
with the URL at the bottom of the sheets. No need that all 100 do this
themselves. One person can do it in a few hours. When Verisign can handle
the load on their sitefinder server park. At times I cannot get any page
from it.

-- 
[06] This email is really a confirmation.
http://logoff.org/