GNSO Email Archives: [ga]

ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] ALAC statement on resolution of non-existing domain name s

To: Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ga] ALAC statement on resolution of non-existing domain name s
From: Jim Ayson <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:44:39 +0800
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <0l5pmvgodudr7bunqhsbcdkpqoes23a972@4ax.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10309181757070.15855-100000@spitfire.law.miami.edu> <20030918224215.F3175-100000@fuchsia.bijt.net> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10309181757070.15855-100000@spitfire.law.miami.edu>
Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Vittorio,

Does the ALAC statement also cover the ccTLDs that have been redirecting non-existing domain names or is limited to the Verisign situation?

As stated previously, the .PH registry has been practicing this for some time, but there hasn't been any complaint from the ALAC.

According to a post on the AU DNS list, other registries doing this include ac, cc, cx, mp, nu, pw, sh, tk, tm, ws, and .museum.

- jim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ga] ALAC statement on resolution of non-existing domain name s
  - From: Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [ga] ALAC statement on resolution of non-existing domain name s
  - From: J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin

References:
- Re: [ga] ALAC statement on resolution of non-existing domain name s
  - From: Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
- Re: [ga] ALAC statement on resolution of non-existing domain name s
  - From: Marc Schneiders
- Re: [ga] ALAC statement on resolution of non-existing domain name s
  - From: Vittorio Bertola

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>