Re: [ga] So, the way that ICANN handles legal objections to TLDS on its website is to delete them?

["John Palmer" <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

So typical of the ICANN racket! You can’t even file an objection without paying 
ransom money to their 
hand-picked cronies.

Sorry – AWI has a legally protected claim on .EARTH.  ICANN and the applicants 
will soon be receiving
formal notification of our intent to defend our copyrighted directory property.


From: Rubens Kuhl 
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 8:39 AM
To: John Palmer 
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: Re: [ga] So, the way that ICANN handles legal objections to TLDS on 
its website is to delete them?


On Apr 18, 2014, at 1:40 AM, John Palmer <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:


  Over a year and a half ago, when the objections period for new TLDs was open, 
I filed a legal objection on
  ICANN’s website to two applications for the TLD “.EARTH” since these TLDs are 
the property of my company
  and we have been operating them since 1995 (and still are). 

  When I look at the ICANN website, under objections for the new TLDs, here:

  http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/odr/determination

  I see that they seemed to have deleted the objections and never even 
processed them. So, I guess the
  objections process is just a scam.



What type of objections your company filed ? The objections, no matter the 
outcome or lack of it, where published by the ADR providers.

ICC:
http://www.iccwbo.org/Data/Documents/Buisness-Services/Dispute-Resolution-Services/Expertise/ICANN-New-gTLD-Dispute-Resolution/List-of-Pending-Cases/

WIPO:
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/lro/

ICDR:
http://go.adr.org/icanngtld

I couldn’t find any objections to .earth on any provider… note that filing an 
objection is not just posting a comment, as you did here:
https://gtldcomment.icann.org/comments-feedback/applicationcomment/commentdetails/6237

Filing an objection is actually following the objection process, paying money 
to the ADR, providing a lots of pages of reasoning… a comment is just a 
comment. 


Rubens