<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] RE: GA irrelevant
- To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, Accountability Headquarters <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] RE: GA irrelevant
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 16:42:49 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family:
Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-color:#ffffff;color:black;}p{margin:0px}</STYLE>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18904"></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<P>Eric and all,</P>
<P> </P>
<P> Good points all. It doesn't hurt to submit a proposal, and if
it is rejected hopefully a specific</P>
<P>reason or set of reasons will be given and the proposal can be fine tunned
to address those</P>
<P>reasons if appropriate or advisable. If the reason or reasons given
for a rejection that are</P>
<P>idological in nature or considered less than appropriate, than the debate as
to the merits</P>
<P>of the original proposal can commence and hopefully the best arguments will
be recognized</P>
<P>accordingly and adjustments, give and take can be had by both, all or any
interested parties,</P>
<P>which means everyone. After all the 'Internet is for everyone", and we
are all effected parties,</P>
<P>right? >:)<BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px;
MARGIN-LEFT: 0px">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker
<HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: May 26, 2010 4:01 PM <BR>To: Accountability
Headquarters <GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: Re: [ga] RE: GA irrelevant <BR><BR>
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top>I like this sentiment. Too often we use categories to
exclude. Too often I find myself holding back on professional personal data so
as not to get pigeon holed. Bad enough that I am a large American
White Guy middle aged.
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>A nod would be good from the ICANN insiders. Actually though I think
Roberto has been, nodding, winking, coaxing and damn near pleading for these
folks to submit.<BR><BR>--- On <B>Wed, 5/26/10, Karl Auerbach
<I><karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx></I></B> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px;
MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><BR>From: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject:
Re: [ga] RE: GA irrelevant<BR>To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx><BR>Cc:
"GNSO GA Mailing List" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Date: Wednesday, May 26,
2010, 1:52 AM<BR><BR>
<DIV class=plainMail><BR>On 05/25/2010 09:19 PM, Avri Doria wrote:<BR><BR>>
Non commercial registrants don't need a miracle. The
Noncommercial<BR>> Stakeholder Group (NCSG) already allows for individual
noncommercial<BR>> registrants to apply for membership.<BR><BR>It's easy to
box those legal fictions known as "corporations" and "associations" and
"partnerships" into commercial (or not) boxes - that's because their formation
and legal existence is premised on their engagement in economic
activities.<BR><BR>But human registrants don't fit nicely into the "commercial"
and "non-commercial" buckets. We people simultaneously bathe in the
stream of commerce and the stream of non-commercial life.<BR><BR>It's rather
Procrustean to cut and stretch us in order to fit us onto ICANN's
"non-commercial" iron bed.<BR><BR>For example, my "cavebear.com" is used by me
for both commercial and non-commercial purposes. I am just as much at
home in ICANN's commercial groups as in the non-commercial ones.<BR><BR>And
one's activities may change their color over time - for instance things like
Google started out as non-commercial experiments by individual
people.<BR><BR>(By-the-way, I agree with Roberto that the burden of moving
forward is on the aspirants to form the new group. I was just suggesting
that ICANN's board give a nod of encouragement.)<BR><BR>
--karl--<BR><BR><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR>Regards,<BR><BR>Jeffrey
A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 300+k members/stakeholders
and growing, strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom"
-<BR> Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance
of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore
Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the
burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied
by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll
Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir.
1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated
1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of<BR>Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good
standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Phone:
214-244-4827<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|