Re: CENSORSHIP IS BAD FOR ICANN Re: [ga] Weekly posting summary for ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

["John Palmer" <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Maybe they are tired of all of your lies.

By the way, I'm warning all of the people on Twitter and Facebook about you, 
Joe. 

I'm going to follow you around the internet and make sure people know the score 
about
you.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Joe Baptista 
  To: Thomas Narten 
  Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; Hugh Dierker ; Rod Beckstrom 
  Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 10:42 PM
  Subject: CENSORSHIP IS BAD FOR ICANN Re: [ga] Weekly posting summary for 
ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


  Mr. Narten:

  Either I'm being censored again - secretly by ICANN - and very good job too - 
or there's a problem on your end with the weekly posting summary? Which 
incidentally I'm a big fan of.

  I have made several posting this week on the GA - but don't seem to be listed 
in the report. Would you let me know what happened here?

  Much thanks in advance
  joe baptista


  On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Thomas Narten <narten@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


    Total of 26 messages in the last 7 days.

    script run at: Fri Apr  9 00:53:02 EDT 2010

       Messages   |      Bytes        | Who
    --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------
     30.77% |    8 | 39.01% |   191259 | hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx
     23.08% |    6 | 24.05% |   117909 | baxtertms@xxxxxxxxx
     19.23% |    5 | 19.19% |    94080 | jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     11.54% |    3 | 10.87% |    53272 | jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
     3.85% |    1 |  2.74% |    13428 | charlie.syracuse@xxxxxxxxx
     3.85% |    1 |  2.42% |    11875 | peter@xxxxxxxx
     3.85% |    1 |  0.95% |     4665 | narten@xxxxxxxxxx
     3.85% |    1 |  0.77% |     3791 | sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------
    100.00% |   26 |100.00% |   490279 | Total