[ga] [Fwd: STLR Publication: "Historic Perspectives on Law & Science"]
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> All, <p> To try to keep things legally speaking in a more level perspective <br>perhaps the following forwarded perspective can lend some <br>assistance, to include OnlineNic's troubles... ??? <p> If not, at least do yourselves a favor and read this well done <br>Historic perspective. In my first reading, I found it execellent! >:) <p>-------- Original Message -------- <table BORDER=0 CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 > <tr> <th ALIGN=RIGHT VALIGN=BASELINE NOWRAP>Subject: </th> <td>STLR Publication: "Historic Perspectives on Law & Science"</td> </tr> <tr> <th ALIGN=RIGHT VALIGN=BASELINE NOWRAP>Date: </th> <td>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:45:20 -0800</td> </tr> <tr> <th ALIGN=RIGHT VALIGN=BASELINE NOWRAP>From: </th> <td>Leslie Liang <lliang@xxxxxxxxxxxx></td> </tr> <tr> <th ALIGN=RIGHT VALIGN=BASELINE NOWRAP>To: </th> <td>stlr-update@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</td> </tr> </table> <center> <p><img SRC="cid:part1.495D7C6A.50DC7BD7@ix.netcom.com" ALT="STLR logo" height=77 width=623></center> <p><br> <p>The Stanford Technology Law Review is pleased to announce the publication of the following article: <p>Robin Feldman, <i>Historic Perspectives on Law & Science</i>, 2009 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 1 (2009). <blockquote>Law has had a long and troubled relationship with science. The misuse of science within the legal realm, as well as our failed attempts to make law more scientific, are well documented. The cause of these problems, however, is less clear. <p>I would like to suggest that the unsatisfying relationship of law and science can be attributed, at least in part, to law?s inadequate understanding of what constitutes science and law?s inflated view of the potential benefits of science for law. It is our failure to understand what science knows about its own enterprise, as well as our fervent hope that law could be something other than it is, that leads us astray.</blockquote> The full article may be accessed and downloaded in .pdf form at the following URL: <a href="http://stlr.stanford.edu/pdf/hall-digital-defamation.pdf";>http://stlr.stanford.edu/pdf/feldman-historic-perspectives.pdf</a> <p>Copyright © 2009 Stanford Technology Law Review. All Rights Reserved. <br> <p>Regards, <p>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!) <br>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - <br> Abraham Lincoln <br>"YES WE CAN!" Barack ( Berry ) Obama <p>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is <br>very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt <p>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; <br>liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by <br>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." <br>United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] <br>=============================================================== <br>Updated 1/26/04 <br>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. <br>div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. <br>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail <br>jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <br>My Phone: 214-244-4827 </body> </html> Attachment:
"" --++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**== stlr-update mailing list stlr-update@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/stlr-update |