ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Re: [At-Large] Board Minutes: GNSO Restructuring

  • To: At-Large Worldwide <at-large@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, icann board <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>, ICANN Policy staff <policy-staff@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] Re: [At-Large] Board Minutes: GNSO Restructuring
  • From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:49:44 -0700

Danny and all,

  Nicely worded snow job by the Bod.  Reads very official,
but misrepresents any legitimate consensus...  Reads allot
like AIG and Leman Bros governance documents.  But as
was testified today in the House, a big club with official looking
and reading supporting documentation.  Cronyism at it's
highest, or lowest, depending on your ethical point of view, level.

Danny Younger wrote:

> GNSO Council Restructuring
>
> Whereas, during its 28 August 2008 meeting the Board made several important 
> decisions regarding the new GNSO Council's structure, composition, and 
> implementation timing. These decisions included the formation of four new 
> Stakeholder Groups that comprise a new bicameral (two-house) voting structure 
> that was recommended by the Working Group on GNSO Council Restructuring â?? 
> the WG-GCR.
>
> Whereas, during its 30 September meeting the Board concluded consideration of 
> the WG-GCR Report including its recommendations on Nominating Committee 
> Appointees, election of Council leadership, election of Board seats #13 and 
> #14, voting thresholds for various Council decisions, the role of individual 
> Internet users and their representation within the GNSO, as well as the 
> timing for the implementation of these elements and other key implementation 
> issues.
>
> -- GNSO Restructuring -- (Membership and Leadership Selection:)
>
> It is, Resolved (2008.10.01.06), as recommended by the WG-GCR, the Board 
> authorizes a third Council-level non-voting Nominating Committee Appointee to 
> serve on the Council whose presence could preserve an independent aspect on 
> the Council and could provide useful management support as the Council moves 
> toward a working group management function.
>
> It is, Resolved (2008.10.01.07), the Board authorizes the GNSO Council to 
> elect a Chair consistent with the recommendation of the WG-GCR â?? that the 
> GNSO Chair be elected by a vote of 60% of both voting houses and each voting 
> house has the flexibility to create a process for selecting its own Vice 
> Chair. The Board directs the Council to develop a process for subsequent 
> balloting, if needed, until a Council Chair is duly elected. This process 
> should be developed before the first Chair election of the newly structured 
> Council.
>
> It is, Resolved (2008.10.01.08), the Board and General Counsel have 
> outstanding questions about the WG-GCR recommendations regarding Board seat 
> elections and directs Staff to share these with the community and seek 
> additional input.
>
> -- GNSO Restructuring -- (Operational/Voting Considerations:)
>
> It is, Resolved (2008.10.01.09), the Board adopts all voting thresholds 
> proposed in the WG-GCR Report. The Board requests that the GNSO develop any 
> additional voting thresholds or categories that may be needed as part of its 
> proposed GNSO Improvements Implementation Plan to be submitted to the Board 
> for approval.
>
> -- GNSO Restructuring -- (Stakeholder and Constituency Organizational 
> Concerns:)
>
> It is, Resolved (2008.10.01.10), the Board acknowledges Staff's development 
> of the â??Notice of Intentâ?? documentation for potential new constituencies 
> and directs Staff to develop a formal petition and charter template that will 
> assist applicants in satisfying the formative criteria (consistent with the 
> ICANN Bylaws) to facilitate the Board's evaluation of petitions to form new 
> constituencies. Staff also is directed to work with the existing GNSO 
> constituencies to design and develop a streamlined process along with 
> appropriate mechanisms that will assist with the Board's timely recognition 
> and approval of existing constituencies.
>
> It is, Resolved (2008.10.01.11), the Board reinforces its support for the 
> following principles pertaining to the formation of the new Stakeholder 
> Groups, and requests that all constituency members and other relevant parties 
> comply with the principles included in the BGC Working Group's GNSO 
> Improvements Report approved by the Board in establishing the newly formed 
> structures, including:
>
> The need to better represent the wide variety of groups and individuals that 
> compose the global ICANN community, in a structure that can change more 
> easily with the gTLD environment and stakeholders.
> The inclusion of new actors/participants, where applicable, and the expansion 
> of constituencies within Stakeholder Groups, where applicable.
> It is, further Resolved (2008.10.01.12), that the Board further directs Staff 
> to work with existing constituencies to develop a set of streamlined 
> processes (along with appropriate templates, tools, or other mechanisms) that 
> will assist in the formation of these new Stakeholder Groups and also 
> facilitate the Board's subsequent review and approval of those structures.
>
> It is, Resolved (2008.10.01.13), the Board directs that plans for each of the 
> four new Stakeholder Groups, that are consistent with the above principles, 
> be submitted to the Board for consideration at the ICANN Mexico City Board 
> meeting. The plans must be reviewed and approved by the Board before a newly 
> structured GNSO Council is seated in June 2009. The Board will consider the 
> need for interim action to fill Council seats in the event that it finds any 
> Stakeholder Group plans to be deficient or delayed.
>
> -- GNSO Restructuring -- (The Role of Individual Internet Users in the GNSO:)
>
> It is, Resolved (2008.10.01.14), The Board requests additional community 
> dialogue and input on the appropriate role and representation of individual 
> Internet users, including individual commercial and non-commercial Internet 
> users, in the GNSO. Input from the GNSO, the ALAC and At-Large community, and 
> any relevant applicants for new constituencies, would be particularly helpful 
> and should address the inclusion of registrants and individual users in the 
> GNSO in a manner that compliments the ALAC and its supporting structures, and 
> ensures that registrants' and individual Internet users' gTLD interests are 
> effectively represented within the GNSO.
>
> -- GNSO Restructuring -- (Implementation Timing:)
>
> It is, Resolved (2008.10.01.15), the Board amends its previous implementation 
> timetable and directs that the transition to a new bicameral GNSO Council 
> voting structure take place over a phased implementation schedule that begins 
> immediately and ends in June 2009 with the seating of the new Council. The 
> implementation phases will be as follows:
>
> Phase 1 â?? GNSO Council restructuring implementation plan submitted in 
> advance of the December 2008 Board Meeting;
>
> Phase 2 â?? Existing Constituencies submit confirmation documents to the 
> Board for review in advance of the February 2009 Board Meeting;
>
> Phase 3 â?? Stakeholder Groups submit formal plans for Board approval for 
> consideration at the ICANN Mexico City Board meeting; and
>
> Phase 4 â?? Stakeholder Groups with plans approved by the Board select 
> Council representatives, and the newly structured GNSO Council is seated by 
> the June 2009 Asia-Pacific ICANN Meeting.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>