ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Commerce Department Pushing For New "Copyright Czar"

  • To: Ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, DOC/NTIA ICANN Rep <aheineman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] Commerce Department Pushing For New "Copyright Czar"
  • From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 01:44:59 -0700

All,

  Respectfully and strongly I disagree with DOC in this effort
and idea...  I would also like to know where DOC got it's
figures that "750,000 American jobs have been lost to piracy"?
Why not 749,999 or 750,001??  Me thinks this figure is a
wildly non-statistically supported guess, and comes from IP
SIG's which also can't support this figure with actual statistics
either.

  A "Copyright Czar" much like and "Internet Czar" will not have
any significant positive effect in curbing Copywright violations for
very many obvious reasons.  What would be much more helpful
for DOC to encourage is to call upon Congress to strengthen
and significantly clarify Copywright law, so that there is a clear
path by which Copywright violations in an ever increasing IT
based world can operate safely, and in a more friendly manner...

See:
TechDirt is reporting that those all-too-familiar "stats" surrounding
the
cost of piracy are being trotted out in an attempt to push through a
 http://techdirt.com/articles/20081003/1946432453.shtml new
"Copyright Czar" position. "In urging President Bush to sign into
law the ProIP bill, which would give him a copyright czar (something the

Justice Department had said it it doesn't want), the US Chamber of
Commerce is claiming that 750,000 American jobs have been lost to
piracy.
Yet, it doesn't cite where that number comes from."

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>