RE: [ga] GA in the post GNSO-Review world

[JFC Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 03:07 24/09/2007, Debbie Garside wrote:
> Just a few humble thoughts at 2am in the morning! Am I being Naive here?
You are not. Neither the USG nor your "Unicode" friends are. You just 
are divided.
The point is simple: the legal framework of the IANA is the US legal 
framework and its jurisdiction is global. This does not fit together.
- politically the solution is that the legal framework becomes global 
- this is the WSIS
- normatively the solution is that the normative frameworks remains 
global - this is what you try to oppose.
- practically the solution is that the IANA architecture becomes 
distributed, making everything based upon open interoperability - 
this is what you advocate when you call for ISO 11179 conformity.
This is why the solution is:

- politically to make all the people and entities you want to 
assemble a GA within the proper international legal framework : a 
Dynamic Coalition.
- normatively, to have a better understanding of the normative 
framework (norms, standards, relations to regalias, international 
treaties) the fight we had did help.
- practically to build the multilingual distributed referential 
system architecture (MDRS) the IETF general "internationalisation" 
confusion has delayed, but the Multilingual Internet obliges to, as a 
result of the emergence of the Semantic layer.
jfc