Re: [ga] Questions for Joe Baptista / Eric Dierker, and why the GA list should be ended

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

This clearly was the obvious intent of correspondence we received from the GNSO.
  The GA is a list.
  We are now allowed to moderate our list and that is a good thing in order to 
optimize contributions to ICANN. We are trying to complete self organization as 
a list.
   
  Eric
  As Chair

Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
  
    On 18 sep 2007, at 07.24, JFC Morfin wrote:

    the so-called GNSO/GA approved by the GNSO includes t


  I would like to make clear that the only thing the GSNO council 'approved' 
was the proposal for the 'GA list' to try self govern according to a set of 
by-laws and processes.
  

  The council explicitly gave no judgement on any of the organizational issues 
some people on the 'GA List'  may be discussing.  The GSNO takes no position 
regarding an entity called 'GA' except to indicate that no such entity 
currently exists as part of ICANN, though it did historically, and that such an 
entity if it does currently exist, does _not_ speak for ICANN or as any part of 
ICANN.  
  

  The 'GA List'  is an email list, under GNSO guidelines, open to all 
subscribers and is maintained by ICANN for the purpose of discussing GSNO and 
other ICANN related issues.
  

  Avri


       
---------------------------------
 Check out  the hottest 2008 models today at Yahoo! Autos.