ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[dow2tf]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[dow2tf] RE: [dow1tf] RE: Joint Whois TF1 and 2 call?

  • To: "'Milton Mueller'" <Mueller@xxxxxxx>, dow1tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, metalitz@xxxxxxxx, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [dow2tf] RE: [dow1tf] RE: Joint Whois TF1 and 2 call?
  • From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:24:54 -0400
  • Sender: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Milton,

I believe that the text of the motion is consistent with the discussions we
held last week on the joint call.  I understand your position and will
convey that to the other Task Force Chairs.

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Milton Mueller [mailto:Mueller@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 12:33 PM
To: dow1tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; metalitz@xxxxxxxx;
Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [dow1tf] RE: Joint Whois TF1 and 2 call?


Jeff:
While appreciating the hard work imposed on you by chairing 
the TF, I would recommend that as a matter of course that 
all such important procedural motions be copied to the TF lists 
in the future. Even if we don't have time to change it we would like to know
what is being done. 

>>> "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx> 06/08/04 09:07AM >>>
Below is the text of the note that I believe was sent to Bruce yesterday.
Because it was mainly procedural, and because of the lack of time, we did
not believe it was necessary to have this procedural note reviewed by the
Task Forces.  With respect to the chart you are referring to, we have not





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>