RE: [dow2tf] Joint Whois TF1 and 2 call?
- To: "Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxx>, "Jeff Neuman" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, <dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [dow2tf] Joint Whois TF1 and 2 call?
- From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 09:03:05 -0400
- Sender: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcRNV9UWrUtoZ6rgRASmKQfI0cdI/gAABf+w
- Thread-topic: Joint Whois TF1 and 2 call?
As some are aware, I am not available Wednesday at that time, due to being in the air/returning from ITU. I had hoped to provide written comments on the documents, so that David could represent the BC on both TF reports. Without a document to review today, with some reasonable time to do so, and get comments in, I am handicapped.
I will be online for about 2 more hours, maybe three. Please send any documents to both this address and to marilynscade@xxxxxxx, so in case they do come through, I can retrieve them. I will have limited email access from 5 on today/Geneva time.
If we are without documents in a timely manner, I will not see them until Wednesday around 5:30 p.m. EST or later.
Marilyn S. Cade
AT&T Law & Government Affairs
1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 1000N
Washington, DC 20036
From: Steve Metalitz [mailto:metalitz@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:55 AM
To: Jeff Neuman; dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [dow2tf] Joint Whois TF1 and 2 call?
Jeff and Jordyn,
According to my notes the main business of tomorrow's call was to review two documents to be prepared by the two chairs: the draft request to GNSO Council re timetable and future work, and the chart identifying areas of overlap or conflict between the preliminary reports of the two TFs.
Since, unless I have missed some mail, neither of these documents has been circulated yet, would it be more efficient to postpone the joint TF call until such time as both have been circulated and the TF members have had some time to review them?