<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [dow1tf] Would Fri. 18 be better than Thurs.17 for joint Whoistf. call?
- To: <dfares@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Milton Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [dow1tf] Would Fri. 18 be better than Thurs.17 for joint Whoistf. call?
- From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 08:56:08 -0400
- Cc: <dow1tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-dow1tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcRSDo94zEqHvCZ9SvC4bDBdhBzdwgAADDCg
- Thread-topic: [dow1tf] Would Fri. 18 be better than Thurs.17 for joint Whoistf. call?
I have a Council call on Wedneaday that creates a conflict for a couple of hours. in the a.m. and am tied up all p.m. on Wednesday, having moved things from Thursday. :-(
Marilyn S. Cade
AT&T Law & Government Affairs
1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 1000N
Washington, DC 20036
202-457-2106v
281-664-9731 e-fax
202-360-1196 c
mcade@xxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: David Fares [mailto:dfares@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 9:48 AM
To: gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Milton Mueller
Cc: dow1tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [dow1tf] Would Fri. 18 be better than Thurs.17 for joint
Whoistf. call?
Wednesday is best for me as well.
Thanks,
David
Date sent: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:38:48 -0400
From: "Milton Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>
To: <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Copies to: <dow1tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [dow1tf] Would Fri. 18 be better than Thurs.17 for joint
Whoistf. call?
> Friday is better for me than Thursday, but Wednesdaythe 16th is much
> better than Friday.
>
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, at 20:08 [=GMT+0200], GNSO SECRETARIAT wrote:
>
>
>
David A. Fares
Director, Electronic Commerce
U.S. Council for International Business
dfares@xxxxxxxxx
Tel: 212-703-5061
212-354-4480
Fax: 212-575-0327
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|