Re: [dow1-2tf] WHOIS TF 1/2

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Another interessting feature is that they provide a kind of audit
trail in case they provide "private" information to a third party.

Best,

tom

Am 19.01.2005 schrieb David W. Maher:
> The proposal for access is somewhat broader than "court order"
> 
> We will disclose personal information, other than via the WHOIS, as stated 
> below, and the "Registration Information Access Rules and Procedures", as 
> explained above, only:
> 
> (a) in the event that a law enforcement agency, court of competent 
> jurisdiction, tribunal, judicial board, administrative body, judicial 
> commission, or any other judicial body of competent jurisdiction requests 
> personal information by way of an order, ruling, decision, subpoena, 
> warrant, or judgment;
> 
> (b) pursuant to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic 
> Documents Act S.C. 2000, c. 5; or
> 
> (c) if the domain name is subject to a proceeding under the CIRA Dispute 
> Resolution Policy, to the relevant Dispute Resolution Provider.
> 
> At 11:08 AM 1/18/2005, Steven J. Metalitz IIPA wrote:
> > This proposal is for tiered access in the sense that registrars have
> >access to more data than the public, but not beyond that.  Specifically
> >the only method for access by non-registrar businesses, consumers,
> >intellectual property owners, or law enforcement would be by court
> >order.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >[mailto:owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David W. Maher
> >Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 11:41 AM
> >To: dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: [dow1-2tf] WHOIS TF 1/2
> >
> >Here is the URL for the Canadian proposal that involves a "tiered
> >access"
> >approach to availability of WHOIS information:
> >http://www.cira.ca/en/Whois/whois_intro.html
> >David Maher
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w