AW: [council] Review Project List

["Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Berry,
 
 
indeed, I was looking the redline version not understanding that the"2nd" 
graph is also put in red lines.
Sorry for the confusion.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
 
 
 
 
-----Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: RE: [council] Review Project List
Datum: 2016-12-01T17:32:27+0100
Von: "Berry Cobb" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
An: "'WUKnoben'" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Glen de Saint Géry'" 
<Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
 
 

Hi Wolf-Ulrich,

 

If I understand correctly, you are referencing the red-line version of the 
project list.

 

The difference, as you note, is based on time.  Specifically, what projects 
have changed from the prior version to this current version.  The projects 
are tabulated based on where they reside on the various phases of the 
policy development process.

 

Here are a few explanations for the changes:

1.       Issue Identification – this is primarily the GNSO Council Actions 
list.  Prior version showed 9 open items, while the current one shows 7.

2.       A project (Auctions Proceeds) moved to the Working Group phase, as 
the Council (and other SO/ACs) approved its Charter in Hyderabad.  As you 
know Members are being decided now, as well as a call for Participants is 
underway.

3.       The GNSO Review WG motion will be considered at today’s meeting, 
and as such, migrated from Working Group to Council Deliberations.  Once 
adopted and later approved by the Board, it will migrate to Implementation.

4.       GAC-GNSO Consultation Group motion was adopted in Hyderabad, and 
thus migrated to Implementation for staff action.

 

The red-line changes in the table below the graphs provide the primary key 
to the changes.

 

I hope this is helpful.

 

B

 

Berry A. Cobb

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers

720.839.5735

mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

@berrycobb

 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of WUKnoben
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 09:14
To: Glen de Saint Géry; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Review Project List

 

Thanks Glen,

 

I have one question for the call later today: the 1st two bar graphs seem 
to show the projects’ status. What is the difference (time?)?


Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 

From: Glen de Saint Géry

Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 3:37 PM

To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject: [council] Review Project List

 

 

Dear Councillors,

 

Attached please find the updated Project List in both red-line and clean 
version for your review before the Council meetings. If there are no 
comments, the list will be posted on the website on page.

http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/project
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/project>

and be directly viewed at:

http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf
<http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf>

 

Thanks so much.

Kind regards,

Glen

 

 

Glen de Saint Géry

GNSO Secretariat

gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

http://gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/>

 

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO

Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>
 
.